Connecting the dots, the bigger picture
Posted: 23 Aug 2026, 13:57
In the last months this forum seems a bit dead, and it makes me a bit sad. There is so much more to explore. I just want to use this forum to get a better understanding of our world, past and present. Lately I feel like I start to finally see how everything fits together. I am humble enough not to rule out the possibility that I might be totally wrong, but you have to prove me wrong to convince me.
Reading Fomenko left me confused. Although it seems clear to me that our historical time line is altered, its hard to believe all our written history would have happened in the last thousand years, as Fomenko claims. Maybe its due to his Russian nationalist bias, since another thing about his theory hard for me to swallow, is that world history is supposedly basically Russian. And Russians don't exists that long, so for that Fomenko needs a short time frame.
Lately I have been reading the work of Polat Kaya, and it has been very enlightening. Kaya claims the following. When the last ice age came to an end and the climate got warmer, Europe got inhabited from the east, by Turanians, or ancient Turks. During the ice age they used to live in Central Asia, unlike Europe and Northern America, most of Asia remained ice free. When the ice started melting, an extremely large lake formed suddenly in Central Asia, as Kaya claims, this was the origin of the flood 'myths'.
According to Kaya, once the whole world spoke Turkish. I think we can see a Turkish nationalist bias here, and full disclosure, the whole Turanian theory is according to the mainstream extreme right wing propaganda, and surely this theory is exactly what Turkish nationalists like to hear (The Kurds and Armenians are also Turks who got separated from the rest, divide and rule).
It might be partially true. Kaya shows convincingly how the Euskara or Basque language is a manipulated form of Turkish. It is assumed this pre Indo-European language was once spoken in large parts of Europe, before the 'Aryan' invasion. Officially no one knows where the language came from. So if it is really Turkish, its an important clue.
According to Kaya, Aryan means wanderer in Turkish, so the Aryans are Roma or Gypsies from India. Of course they claim themselves it means 'noble', because that's what they were not, that's why they took power by marrying into the Turanian royal families. They took over the rule in Egypt from the Turanians, and changed the name of the country to Egypt to claim it theirs! I guess I can call them Gypsies if they apparently used that name for themselves in the past? Maybe they changed it into Roma when 'their' empire was built? But as Leland states, the Gypsies called themselves already in India Rom, meaning 'a real gypsy'. The name Gypsy comes according a Gypsy legend, from chen-kan, or zingan, meaning moon-sun.
I was always interested in Gypsies, the wandering lifestyle, it seemed romantic to me, the freedom, or maybe I feel a connection also. I always liked the classic Rumanian music. My uncle who worked in a circus, also a curious fact. Since I know my surname is not only used by Jews but also by Gypsies, I am even more intrigued.
Turns out I am not the only one. As Leland writes; 'I have frequently been asked, “Why do you take an interest in gypsies?” And it is not so easy to answer. Why, indeed? In Spain one who has been fascinated by them is called one of the aficion, or affection, or “fancy;” he is an aficionado, or affected unto them, and people there know perfectly what it means, for every Spaniard is at heart a Bohemian. He feels what a charm there is in a wandering life, in camping in lonely places, under old chestnut-trees, near towering cliffs, al pasar del arroyo, by the rivulets among the rocks. He thinks of the wine skin and wheaten cake when one was hungry on the road, of the mules and tinkling bells, the fire by night, and the cigarito, smoked till he fell asleep. Then he remembers the gypsies who came to the camp, and the black-eyed girl who told him his fortune, and all that followed in the rosy dawn and ever onward into starry night.'
The following Gypsy song is from the same book:
'The wind whistles over the heath,
The moonlight flits over the flood;
And the gypsy lights up his fire,
In the darkness of the wood.
Hurrah!
In the darkness of the wood.
Free is the bird in the air,
And the fish where the river flows;
Free is the deer in the forest,
And the gypsy wherever he goes.
Hurrah!
And the gypsy wherever he goes.'
Kaya claims the Etruscans were Turanians, so Rome was a Turanian city. The 'Aryans' came much later and took over. Greek and Latin are manufactured languages, the priests changed Turkish in a completely new language. Here I think Kaya goes a bit too far, claiming all Indo European and Semitic languages are derived from Turkish. I am getting more and more convinced that the 'Romans' came from Romania. The Romanian language is the closest to classic Latin of all languages, and I think that is not a coincidence. The Oera Linda book makes me believe that the ancient Frisian language was also an original, and Latin might be a mix of Frisian, Romanian and Turkish?. So in my new understanding are the Gypsies like the Jews, they are supposed to be the eternal scapegoat, the underdog, but their elite cousins rule the world, and need their less privileged cousins as eternal scapegoats for their own crimes. Funny how the elite seems to be proud to be part of the chosen people whenever it fits them, but no one in their right mind would want to admit to be Gypsy.
According to the Oera Linda, both Europeans and Asians came from Altland, and this confirms our Turanian or Tartarian if you like, history. Kaya states how Europe is artificially created, all we need to know about what a scam Europe is, is to know it was the name of a Phoenician princess. Of course Europe is just the western peninsula of the Eurasian continent.
The Phoenicians are supposed to be a Semitic people, but from the Oera Linda we know they were a mix of Frya's folk and Canaanites. For Kaya they were all Turanian. I think he is right, if you see Turanian as a name for the people of Eurasia, or at least a big part of it. So it includes both nordic looking people, as well 'mongoloid'. Both peoples survivors of the same flood. Being 'Caucasian' finally starts to make sense!
The Moors or Murs, who ruled Iberia for centuries, are usually thought of to be Arabs and/or black Africans. In the Netherlands, while the rest of the world was burning (yeah I know, its mostly theatre), one of the major debates in society of the last years, was the racist concept of 'Zwarte Piet'. Turns out Black Pete was never black, Saint Nicolas' helpers were enslaved Moors, and they were not black. Mur in Turkish means Purple, so who else can they be than the Phoenicians (including a big North African Berber influence, who are in part themselves descendants of the Carthagenians).
If we accept that the ancient Iberians (not only the Basques) were Turanian, it makes a lot of sense that a lot of Sephardic Jews fled to the Ottoman empire after the inquisition. The Turks were always very tolerant towards the Jews.
Of course many went to the 'new' world, in fact so many, that we call a big part of it 'Latin America'. If you know that the Sephardic Jews had their own language; Ladino, everything becomes crystal clear. Of course it was just a change of names, and flags. Soon after the 'Christians' took over the last part of Al Andalus (Granada), their colony of Granada in North America got a new name. Early maps of the Americas shows mostly Catalan and Ottoman flags, they got replaced by the flags of Castile and Leon, and later also the English and the Dutch. It is a bit weird that the Spanish and Portuguese got to the Americas a century earlier than the English and Dutch. It seems like the Jewish Catalan prince (Nasi) known by the name Columbus, really got the whole thing for himself, as a present of the Pope. Maybe the Jews of the north got jealous and 'protested', and became 'protestants' as a result?
I am sure I still don't see the full picture, though. Tamil Tigers would eat the Grey Wolves raw, if you understand what I mean. Like some claim Turkish is the worlds original language, others say it is Tamil. The Tamils have their own altland; the lost continent of Kumari Kandam, better known in the West as Lemuria. All black people are said to be from this continent, that once stretched from Madagaskar until Indonesia. Sri Lanka is supposed to be the last remnant of this massive continent. This theory explains how we find black people in Africa, but also in Papua New Guinea and Australia. It would be ironic if this is all true, because its the opposite of what we all learned in school, the 'Out of Africa' theory. Not that I would be surprised, I mean, in the smoke and mirrors world we live in.
It is also good to mention that there is a connection between the Dravidian/Tamil languages of South India, and Hebrew. According to scholars, early Jewish traders settled there, that's why some words are similar. But what if the Jews originally came from India (or Kumari Kandam), like the Gypsies?
The story about slavery is not black and white, like the current narrative focusing just on the trans-Atlantean slave trade. Slave trade was always a Semitic business, the Phoenicians (by then corrupted by the local Canaanites, speaking in the local proto Hebrew language), Jews and Arabs were not racist, in the sense they didn't care about the skin color of their merchandise. Christians got protection to a certain degree, I guess this was the carrot that made us accept the religion of the 'Aryans', the Abraham/Brahmans. So to be free we accepted to be enslaved by our priests? Makes a lot of sense.
Also I want to point out to the people who shout right wing extremist at me for talking about Jews and Gypsies, and giving attention to Turkish propaganda (I am also starting to doubt the historical truthfulness of the Armenian genocide for instance), the current narrative is fine for nationalists in Greece or Italy. Also the 'wandering people' made sure to write themselves a glorious history, by stealing the inventions of the Turanians and claim them as their own. Its weird how fascists and Nazis idolised the Roman past, without leaving a stain on it. It's extremely ironic that the real Aryans, according to the history that cannot be doubted because it's illegal, went to Poland to get exterminated. Some Jews had to die to make the Zionist dream come true. Without a certain Austrian crypto Jew, and German capital, Israel would not be such a big success. Still this does not make me an anti Semite (crypto) Jew. I simply try to understand my family and ancestors a little. Being part of a tribe never determinates if someone is good or evil. Okay, maybe stealing is culturally accepted among Gypsies, and changing and stealing languages to totally enslave people, just a hobby from some weird desert wanderers.. We don't escape our Karma. Being part of the families is as much a curse as a gift.
Speaking of the Greeks, I guess this Turanian link solves it all, who was first, the Greeks or the Turks. They both claim the same land, culture, food... They even look the same. The only difference seems to be the language, turns out the Greek one just being a corrupted form of Turkish. I hope they are reading this in Cyprus, so they know they are all Turanians, it was just a game of divide and rule from the priest class.
Talking about the priest class, let me be clear, there are no coincidences, just cohencidences, if you get what I mean. And no, that is not a racist thing to say, because we Jews, are a racially mixed tribe. I am just a rebellious Jew, who especially since 2020, likes to speak out. For me ALL the people of Israel/Palestine are right now as much a victim of propaganda and genocide as it was in the previous war. By speaking out, I prove the real racists/extremists wrong, not all Jews are part of the conspiracy.
Shalom
https://www.polatkaya.net/
Clarke, H. The Turanian Epoch of the Romans, as Also of the Greeks, Germans, and Anglo-Saxons, in
Relation to the Early History of the World, (1880), Cambridge University Press on behalf of the Royal Historical Society
Leland, C.G. The Gypsies,(1882), The Riverside Press, Cambridge
Oera Linda
Pujadas, A.M. The other colonisation of America, according to maps and neochronology. (2023) Self published.
Victor, Ma. So., Naanjil Amal, The submerged Kumari continent (The Home of Ancient Tamils), (2014) Yaathisai Publications
Reading Fomenko left me confused. Although it seems clear to me that our historical time line is altered, its hard to believe all our written history would have happened in the last thousand years, as Fomenko claims. Maybe its due to his Russian nationalist bias, since another thing about his theory hard for me to swallow, is that world history is supposedly basically Russian. And Russians don't exists that long, so for that Fomenko needs a short time frame.
Lately I have been reading the work of Polat Kaya, and it has been very enlightening. Kaya claims the following. When the last ice age came to an end and the climate got warmer, Europe got inhabited from the east, by Turanians, or ancient Turks. During the ice age they used to live in Central Asia, unlike Europe and Northern America, most of Asia remained ice free. When the ice started melting, an extremely large lake formed suddenly in Central Asia, as Kaya claims, this was the origin of the flood 'myths'.
According to Kaya, once the whole world spoke Turkish. I think we can see a Turkish nationalist bias here, and full disclosure, the whole Turanian theory is according to the mainstream extreme right wing propaganda, and surely this theory is exactly what Turkish nationalists like to hear (The Kurds and Armenians are also Turks who got separated from the rest, divide and rule).
It might be partially true. Kaya shows convincingly how the Euskara or Basque language is a manipulated form of Turkish. It is assumed this pre Indo-European language was once spoken in large parts of Europe, before the 'Aryan' invasion. Officially no one knows where the language came from. So if it is really Turkish, its an important clue.
According to Kaya, Aryan means wanderer in Turkish, so the Aryans are Roma or Gypsies from India. Of course they claim themselves it means 'noble', because that's what they were not, that's why they took power by marrying into the Turanian royal families. They took over the rule in Egypt from the Turanians, and changed the name of the country to Egypt to claim it theirs! I guess I can call them Gypsies if they apparently used that name for themselves in the past? Maybe they changed it into Roma when 'their' empire was built? But as Leland states, the Gypsies called themselves already in India Rom, meaning 'a real gypsy'. The name Gypsy comes according a Gypsy legend, from chen-kan, or zingan, meaning moon-sun.
I was always interested in Gypsies, the wandering lifestyle, it seemed romantic to me, the freedom, or maybe I feel a connection also. I always liked the classic Rumanian music. My uncle who worked in a circus, also a curious fact. Since I know my surname is not only used by Jews but also by Gypsies, I am even more intrigued.
Turns out I am not the only one. As Leland writes; 'I have frequently been asked, “Why do you take an interest in gypsies?” And it is not so easy to answer. Why, indeed? In Spain one who has been fascinated by them is called one of the aficion, or affection, or “fancy;” he is an aficionado, or affected unto them, and people there know perfectly what it means, for every Spaniard is at heart a Bohemian. He feels what a charm there is in a wandering life, in camping in lonely places, under old chestnut-trees, near towering cliffs, al pasar del arroyo, by the rivulets among the rocks. He thinks of the wine skin and wheaten cake when one was hungry on the road, of the mules and tinkling bells, the fire by night, and the cigarito, smoked till he fell asleep. Then he remembers the gypsies who came to the camp, and the black-eyed girl who told him his fortune, and all that followed in the rosy dawn and ever onward into starry night.'
The following Gypsy song is from the same book:
'The wind whistles over the heath,
The moonlight flits over the flood;
And the gypsy lights up his fire,
In the darkness of the wood.
Hurrah!
In the darkness of the wood.
Free is the bird in the air,
And the fish where the river flows;
Free is the deer in the forest,
And the gypsy wherever he goes.
Hurrah!
And the gypsy wherever he goes.'
Kaya claims the Etruscans were Turanians, so Rome was a Turanian city. The 'Aryans' came much later and took over. Greek and Latin are manufactured languages, the priests changed Turkish in a completely new language. Here I think Kaya goes a bit too far, claiming all Indo European and Semitic languages are derived from Turkish. I am getting more and more convinced that the 'Romans' came from Romania. The Romanian language is the closest to classic Latin of all languages, and I think that is not a coincidence. The Oera Linda book makes me believe that the ancient Frisian language was also an original, and Latin might be a mix of Frisian, Romanian and Turkish?. So in my new understanding are the Gypsies like the Jews, they are supposed to be the eternal scapegoat, the underdog, but their elite cousins rule the world, and need their less privileged cousins as eternal scapegoats for their own crimes. Funny how the elite seems to be proud to be part of the chosen people whenever it fits them, but no one in their right mind would want to admit to be Gypsy.
According to the Oera Linda, both Europeans and Asians came from Altland, and this confirms our Turanian or Tartarian if you like, history. Kaya states how Europe is artificially created, all we need to know about what a scam Europe is, is to know it was the name of a Phoenician princess. Of course Europe is just the western peninsula of the Eurasian continent.
The Phoenicians are supposed to be a Semitic people, but from the Oera Linda we know they were a mix of Frya's folk and Canaanites. For Kaya they were all Turanian. I think he is right, if you see Turanian as a name for the people of Eurasia, or at least a big part of it. So it includes both nordic looking people, as well 'mongoloid'. Both peoples survivors of the same flood. Being 'Caucasian' finally starts to make sense!
The Moors or Murs, who ruled Iberia for centuries, are usually thought of to be Arabs and/or black Africans. In the Netherlands, while the rest of the world was burning (yeah I know, its mostly theatre), one of the major debates in society of the last years, was the racist concept of 'Zwarte Piet'. Turns out Black Pete was never black, Saint Nicolas' helpers were enslaved Moors, and they were not black. Mur in Turkish means Purple, so who else can they be than the Phoenicians (including a big North African Berber influence, who are in part themselves descendants of the Carthagenians).
If we accept that the ancient Iberians (not only the Basques) were Turanian, it makes a lot of sense that a lot of Sephardic Jews fled to the Ottoman empire after the inquisition. The Turks were always very tolerant towards the Jews.
Of course many went to the 'new' world, in fact so many, that we call a big part of it 'Latin America'. If you know that the Sephardic Jews had their own language; Ladino, everything becomes crystal clear. Of course it was just a change of names, and flags. Soon after the 'Christians' took over the last part of Al Andalus (Granada), their colony of Granada in North America got a new name. Early maps of the Americas shows mostly Catalan and Ottoman flags, they got replaced by the flags of Castile and Leon, and later also the English and the Dutch. It is a bit weird that the Spanish and Portuguese got to the Americas a century earlier than the English and Dutch. It seems like the Jewish Catalan prince (Nasi) known by the name Columbus, really got the whole thing for himself, as a present of the Pope. Maybe the Jews of the north got jealous and 'protested', and became 'protestants' as a result?
I am sure I still don't see the full picture, though. Tamil Tigers would eat the Grey Wolves raw, if you understand what I mean. Like some claim Turkish is the worlds original language, others say it is Tamil. The Tamils have their own altland; the lost continent of Kumari Kandam, better known in the West as Lemuria. All black people are said to be from this continent, that once stretched from Madagaskar until Indonesia. Sri Lanka is supposed to be the last remnant of this massive continent. This theory explains how we find black people in Africa, but also in Papua New Guinea and Australia. It would be ironic if this is all true, because its the opposite of what we all learned in school, the 'Out of Africa' theory. Not that I would be surprised, I mean, in the smoke and mirrors world we live in.
It is also good to mention that there is a connection between the Dravidian/Tamil languages of South India, and Hebrew. According to scholars, early Jewish traders settled there, that's why some words are similar. But what if the Jews originally came from India (or Kumari Kandam), like the Gypsies?
The story about slavery is not black and white, like the current narrative focusing just on the trans-Atlantean slave trade. Slave trade was always a Semitic business, the Phoenicians (by then corrupted by the local Canaanites, speaking in the local proto Hebrew language), Jews and Arabs were not racist, in the sense they didn't care about the skin color of their merchandise. Christians got protection to a certain degree, I guess this was the carrot that made us accept the religion of the 'Aryans', the Abraham/Brahmans. So to be free we accepted to be enslaved by our priests? Makes a lot of sense.
Also I want to point out to the people who shout right wing extremist at me for talking about Jews and Gypsies, and giving attention to Turkish propaganda (I am also starting to doubt the historical truthfulness of the Armenian genocide for instance), the current narrative is fine for nationalists in Greece or Italy. Also the 'wandering people' made sure to write themselves a glorious history, by stealing the inventions of the Turanians and claim them as their own. Its weird how fascists and Nazis idolised the Roman past, without leaving a stain on it. It's extremely ironic that the real Aryans, according to the history that cannot be doubted because it's illegal, went to Poland to get exterminated. Some Jews had to die to make the Zionist dream come true. Without a certain Austrian crypto Jew, and German capital, Israel would not be such a big success. Still this does not make me an anti Semite (crypto) Jew. I simply try to understand my family and ancestors a little. Being part of a tribe never determinates if someone is good or evil. Okay, maybe stealing is culturally accepted among Gypsies, and changing and stealing languages to totally enslave people, just a hobby from some weird desert wanderers.. We don't escape our Karma. Being part of the families is as much a curse as a gift.
Speaking of the Greeks, I guess this Turanian link solves it all, who was first, the Greeks or the Turks. They both claim the same land, culture, food... They even look the same. The only difference seems to be the language, turns out the Greek one just being a corrupted form of Turkish. I hope they are reading this in Cyprus, so they know they are all Turanians, it was just a game of divide and rule from the priest class.
Talking about the priest class, let me be clear, there are no coincidences, just cohencidences, if you get what I mean. And no, that is not a racist thing to say, because we Jews, are a racially mixed tribe. I am just a rebellious Jew, who especially since 2020, likes to speak out. For me ALL the people of Israel/Palestine are right now as much a victim of propaganda and genocide as it was in the previous war. By speaking out, I prove the real racists/extremists wrong, not all Jews are part of the conspiracy.
Shalom
https://www.polatkaya.net/
Clarke, H. The Turanian Epoch of the Romans, as Also of the Greeks, Germans, and Anglo-Saxons, in
Relation to the Early History of the World, (1880), Cambridge University Press on behalf of the Royal Historical Society
Leland, C.G. The Gypsies,(1882), The Riverside Press, Cambridge
Oera Linda
Pujadas, A.M. The other colonisation of America, according to maps and neochronology. (2023) Self published.
Victor, Ma. So., Naanjil Amal, The submerged Kumari continent (The Home of Ancient Tamils), (2014) Yaathisai Publications